Only $42.95
+$9.95 S&H

30-Day Money Back Guarantee
*less shipping/restocking fee


All Major Credit
Cards Accepted
People are appealing their cases and winning!
   
 

People are appealing their cases and winning!  Judges are ignoring the law, but the higher court won't stand for it.  Read the cases and believe!

Download these WINNING cases!
There is nothing like being prepared when you go to court!  Read winning cases where the Superior Court has told a city court that it was CLEARLY WRONG!  From faulty tickets to faulty service, you'll find examples here.




 
Appeal from Scottsdale Court
-Decided March, 2006-
The ticketed person was wrongly defaulted.  The court should have accepted her information that she was not the driver.  The court was wrong to refuse to set aside default. After the appeal, Scottsdale dismissed the case.

Fine reversed: $228.00
Cost of service of process reversed: $26.00








 
Appeal from Scottsdale Court
-Decided March, 2006-
Court was wrong to default defendant.  Service of process was faulty.  Process server failed to give summons to defendant.  Court was wrong to send collection letter.  Court should have set aside judgment when asked.  After appeal, Scottsdale dismissed the case.

Fine reversed:  $228.00
Cost of service of process reversed: $26.00







 
Appeal from Scottsdale Court
-Decided March, 2006-
Service of process invalid: leaving papers at door improper.  Description of person served as "white female" is also insufficient service.  Process server must give reasons to believe person is in the home. Default improper. Appeal court voided judgment and ordered Scottsdale Court to dismiss the case.

Fine reversed: $Amount unknown
Cost of service of process reversed: $26.00
Attorney for Defendant on Appeal: John P. Ager






 
Appeal from Scottsdale Court
-Decided February 2006-
Manifest injustice resulting from Scottsdale Court's failure to set aside default.  Defendant had moved and process server gave papers to her 17-year-old sister.  MALE driver showed in photo radar picture. Attorney for State filed brief admitting defendant was NOT the driver.  Certification of ticket could not have been valid. Appeal court ordered Scottsdale to dismiss the ticket.

Fine reversed: $296.00
Cost of service of process reversed: $17.00






 
Appeal from Scottsdale Court
-Decided February 2006-
Defendant was out of the country on the day the process server swore he served him.  Court was wrong in not setting aside default. Appeal court ordered default judgment set aside.

Fine reversed: $256.00
Cost of service of process reversed: $18.00






 
Appeal from Scottsdale Court
-Decided November 2005-
Scottsdale judge wrong to enter judgment when photo radar picture was unclear.  Judge wrong to say that since picture didn't show that it WASN'T the defendant who was driving, then defendant was responsible.  Insufficent evidence.  Appeal court ordered judgment set aside and ticket dismissed.

Fine reversed: $256.00
Attorney for Defendant on Appeal: Charles P. Franklin






 
Appeal from Scottsdale Court
-Decided November 2005-
Scottsdale had no jurisdiction because ticket certification was invalid. No person reviewed the ticket. Defendant also raised issue that process server swore to serving her and she showed court a plane ticket proving she was in the air at the time! Appeal court ordered dismissal based on faulty certification. This defendant tried repeatedly to resolve this case with city officials who refused to acknowledge their mistake and required her to appeal.

Fine reversed: $256.00
Cost of process service reversed: $18.00


   

 

Home  |  Purchase  Online  |  Install Instructions  |  Testimonials   |   Contact Us
Become a Dealer  |  Press Center  |  Disclaimer & Agreement

*The license plate Loover is sold for off-road use only in states where it would be unlawful otherwise.




Copyright © 2009

National Association Against Photo Radar, Inc.
maintained by BetterThanYours.com